There are so many views about how does one create structure for an organizations that usually it boils down to ones conviction about what will work and what will not work. Given the far reaching impact of structure on delivering strategy, unfortunately this can have unpredictable implications. In addition due to the lagging effect and gestation period, it’s too late by the time one discovers if the structure designed is working well or not.
While structure is such an interesting point of view based exercise at times, there isn’t any laundry list of dos and don’ts for an effective exercise; in my experience some of the following factors impact the same in one way or another:
- Strategy (future scenario) and Process (operations management) are two key levers in any situation. However it’s very critical to understand the trigger for the exercise. Basis the strategy and trigger the relative focus on the two levers could change.
- A very deep process view based exercise is usually triggered by productivity and efficiency enhancement kind of strategies, which is only one of the possible strategies. Basis whether the business strategy is of growth, returns, diversification, product focus, market focus, efficiency focus, productivity focus etc. the approach to the exercise could be drastically different. High level phases might read the same though to naked eye.
- Broad dimensions of structure are Product, customer and geography/market. Even though these elements will remain in any structure, depending upon how the interplay of these dimensions plays out at various levels in the organization, number of structure options is almost endless.
- Matrix structure is more articulation of reporting relationships and MIS and not so much of structure. This is more about how one wants the operations to flow in terms of people interactions and decisions.
- MECE (Mutually Exclusive and Cumulatively Exhaustive) is a very simple but important concept that every structure options must qualify. This in itself can ensure better traction and growth compared to a rather convoluted structure.
- In most cases distortion happens when you start to map people and make adjustments due to ‘sensitivities’… but that’s the reality of every organization.
- Structure, MIS, Variable pay can impact behaviors and culture in a desired direction
~~Rohit~~
August 28, 2008 at 12:00 pm
Hi,
I am Richa from SiliconIndia. I am also an avid blogger for a while now and participating actively in Indian blogosphere. I read your blog posting and found them very interesting and informative. We would love to see a copy of your blogs posted here, whenever you are posting it on blogger.com. Here are some of the benefits of posting your blogs here:
We have a strong community of 500,000 Indian professionals
Best blogs of 2008 to be published in a book “SiliconIndia bLoG PrinT”
Best blog to be printed in SliconIndia & SmartTechie magazines each month
Chance to be featured on homepage everyday
We appreciate your community initiative here and in helping build a more powerful India! Also, if you have any ideas or want to volunteer to help for SiliconIndia, we would be more than excited to get your help. Pls mail me back at richa@siliconindia.com with your suggestions and feedback.
Richa
Blog Editor – SiliconIndia
January 3, 2009 at 5:30 pm
[...] – bookmarked by 3 members originally found by JonKinch on 2008-12-15 Creating Organization Structure – Strategy, Operations and People [...]